Thursday, January 21, 2010

Federal Judge Finds San Francisco Bay's Ghost Fleet Pollution Illegal

Federal Judge Finds San Francisco Bay’s Ghost Fleet Pollution Illegal
Court rules that federal government is illegally polluting the Bay from decaying ships

SAN FRANCISCO, CA (January 21, 2010) – The Maritime Administration (MARAD), a federal agency responsible for San Francisco Bay’s ghost fleet, is illegally polluting and storing hazardous waste in the Bay, according to a federal court’s ruling today.

Judge Garland Burrell’s ruling handed a major victory to environmental groups Natural Resources Defense Council, Arc Ecology and San Francisco Baykeeper, the original plaintiffs in the case, and to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, which joined the suit after it had been filed. The environmental groups sued MARAD, an agency of the U.S. Department of Transportation, in 2007 to force it to stop discharging toxic heavy metals into San Francisco‘s Suisun Bay and to clean up more than 50 large ships abandoned and decaying in the Suisun Bay Reserve Fleet site, near Benicia.

An estimated 20 tons of heavy metals—including lead, zinc, copper and cadmium—have already fallen, blown or washed off the ships into the water, according to a MARAD-commissioned analysis. Projections indicated that the vessels would lose as much as an additional 50 tons of heavy metals in future years, as they succumbed to time and weather, unless cleaned up.

Internal communications and testimony obtained by the environmental groups through the lawsuit show that MARAD has known about the problem for more than a decade. Yet the agency never stopped the illegal pollution and repeatedly ignored several acts of Congress requiring disposal of the ships

Suisun Bay, located in northern San Francisco Bay near the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, is critical habitat for several species of endangered fish—including Chinook salmon and delta smelt. The State of California has warned residents to limit consumption of fish caught in Suisun Bay, due to pollution.

The case is poised to go to trial in June to determine the scope of the clean-up and removal measures. The plaintiffs are seeking removal of the peeling, toxic paint and permanent disposal of all the ships. In response to the litigation, MARAD recently removed two ships to be scrapped, cleaning them in the drydock for the first time ever, and has begun removing some of the peeled paint from remaining ships. However, most of the ships and pollution remain.

Following is a statement by Michael Wall, senior attorney with NRDC:
“This ruling is a huge victory for San Francisco Bay, its wildlife, and the people of California. Sometimes the government acts as if it is above the law. This ruling shows the power of law in hands of citizens to protect their communities and environment from illegal pollution.”

Following is a statement by Jason Flanders, staff attorney with San Francisco Baykeeper:
“The Court’s ruling is clear: each of the ghost fleet ships decaying in Suisun Bay violates our clean water and hazardous waste laws. We can’t allow these vessels to contaminate the Bay for another ten or twenty years. MARAD must clean and remove each vessel from Suisun Bay as quickly and safely as possible.”

Following is a statement by Saul Bloom, executive director of Arc Ecology:
“We are pleased and grateful for today’s court ruling. The federal government is one of the world’s most significant sources of pollution. The Suisun Bay Fleet is but one small example of the enormity of the problem. San Francisco Bay is wrung by more than a dozen sources of federal toxic pollution, many of which are proposed to be left in place to contaminate our fish and affect our environment and public health for generations to come. This victory proves that in a democracy not even the government of the nation is above the law. We will be pressing onward to ensure that at least this source of contamination to our Bay is stopped.”

Following is a statement from Bruce Wolfe, Executive Officer, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board:
“California should not have to sue the federal government to prevent massive and illegal contamination of San Francisco Bay. This ruling underscores the need for MARAD to move quickly to implement a comprehensive and enforceable solution for all its ships and to stop its ongoing violations.”

Close-up photos and B-roll video of the ships are available at: http://www.vimeo.com/nrdcbroadcast/videos

Read Michael Wall's blog about today’s ruling at:
http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/mwall/judge_ghost_fleet_pollution_il.html

___________

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Press contact:
Serena Ingre, NRDC
c: 703-296-0702, w: 415-875-6155,
singre@nrdc.org

Sara Aminzadeh, San Francisco Baykeeper
w: 415-856-0444 x109, c: 415-794-8422
_

Thursday, November 12, 2009

HPS-Candlestick Draft EIR Released

DEIR Publication Date: 12 November 2009

official name of the document:

Candlestick Point-Hunters Point Shipyard Phase II Development Plan Project (formerly the "Bayview Waterfront Project") Draft EIR [DEIR]

locate/read/download the HPS-Candlestick DEIR documents online:
http://www.sfgov.org/site/planning_index.asp?id=80504


*************************************
.
---> DEIR Public Review Period:
12 November– 28 December 2009
.
*************************************

San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Commission
Public Hearing Date: 15 December 2009

San Francisco Planning Commission
Public Hearing Date: 17 December 2009

---> DEIR Public Review Period:
12 November– 28 December 2009

Written comments should be sent to:
Mr. Stanley Muraoka
Environmental Review Officer
San Francisco Redevelopment Agency
One South Van Ness Avenue. Fifth Floor
San Francisco, California 94103
or
Mr. Bill Wycko
Environmental Review Officer
San Francisco Planning Department
1650 Mission Street, Suite 400
San Francisco, California 94103

announcement - availability of DEIR : http://www.sfgov.org/site/uploadedfiles/planning/2007.0946E_Candlestick_NOA.pdf

-

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

in a wordle, Arc Ecology

just found out about a cool app, Wordle. it will make a tag cloud that you can tinker with. here is a Wordle made using our blog (this page) ...

Wordle: blog wordle 12NOV09








try it: http://www.wordle.net/

-

Thursday, October 22, 2009

visit Mare Island

Mare Island Docks.
photo: Stephanie Wright Hession

There is a handy article in the paper today about visiting Mare Island.

read the article HERE:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2009/10/22/NS461A64QI.DTL
-

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Welcome to the NeighborHOOD

THE WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, COMMUNITY ARTS PROJECT: Literacy for Environmental Justice (LEJ) youth in residency with artists over the past year create an interactive installation in the Sargent Johnson Gallery exploring environmental and social justice issues facing the community of Bayview Hunters Point in San Francisco.



21 OCT 2009 – 10 JAN 2010
gallery hours: Mon - Sat -> 12-5 PM

African American Arts and Culture Center
Sargent Johnson Gallery
762 Fulton Street @ Webster
(free parking in lot)
415.922.2049

Walking environmental ‘Tours’ of the neighborhood informed the project participants along with in-depth discussions, and journal writings which led them to create work about their personal experiences, gentrification and displacement, the opposing forces of man vs. nature, art as activism, and the positive people and influences in their community. The project will be installed over a period of two weeks in the Gallery. Visitors are encouraged to participate in this installation process with the youth. Several of the actual art pieces will become parts of an interactive Fort structure, creating shelters inside the gallery for visitors to spend time in contributing to the work and to encourage discussions about community, family, environment and social justice. A documentary film and book will also be part of the exhibition.

details about the 12 NOV gallery opening reception
-
for more information about the project, please visit:
www.welcometotheneighborhood.us

-



Thursday, September 24, 2009

DOUBTFUL PROMISES: A REPORT TO THE ALAMEDA COMMUNITY ON THE SUNCAL/SHAW HEDGE FUND INITIATIVE (prepared by Arc Ecology for Renewed Hope)

Arc Ecology prepared the report: Doubtful Promises: A Report to the Alameda Community on the SunCal/Shaw Hedge Fund Initiative, which is released to the public today.

more details about the report:

PRESS RELEASE
24 September 2009

ALAMEDA – Today Renewed Hope issued “Doubtful Promises : A Report to the Alameda Community on the Suncal/Shaw Hedge Fund Initiative” one day after the initiative’s sponsors submitted signatures hoping to qualify the measure for a 2010 election.

The group’s analysis finds SunCal’s vision of an environmentally sustainable community is missing from the developer-sponsored Alameda Revitalization Initiative.

“Doubtful Promises” explains why Alamedans cannot rely on the Alameda Point Revitalization Initiative to deliver the goods promised by developer SunCal during numerous public presentations it has made to them over the last two years.

According to the 23-page document, the initiative’s content carefully avoids setting any timetables or requirements for any of the projects for Alameda Point development while establishing new rules for governing development that favors the developer and hamstrings the public.

“We don’t think the initiative is going to give us what we have been promised by SunCal,” said Laura Thomas, president of Renewed Hope. “There are too many loopholes in the initiative’s language, nothing compels the developers to build what they showed us in their presentations. They can go back on their promises if it suits them and ignore the desires of the citizenry.”

The problems with the initiative’s language cited in the analysis include:
  • The developer will be able to decide the size, mix of uses, open space plan, public facilities, transit options and their timing, overall and within each zoning district. The initiative also removes, with few exceptions, the authority of the planning board and council, to modify or reject permits and it prohibits their review or appeal of permit approvals.
  • The initiative also fails to guarantee delivery of specific public benefits or improvements, including those it boasts about, and it would divert scarce city and redevelopment resources from the rest of Alameda.
  • The developer would have the right to sell off Alameda Point piece by piece with the entitlements granted under the initiative to any other developers it selects, regardless of their qualifications or intentions.
  • An EIR analyzing the environmental impacts of the initiative would not be completed until after the initiative is passed. The ability of an EIR prepared after approval to consider alternatives and serious mitigations would be greatly compromised by the delay.
  • Alamedans would no longer have any control or be able to correct any problems without approval of the developers for 30 years.
“A healthy agreement between the city and developer must be negotiated to balance the benefit the developer receives with those that the city receives,” said Renewed Hope member Ross Ojeda of Alameda.

“The initiative would guarantee the developer with long-term, extremely valuable entitlements without providing certainty that Alamedans would receive any benefits whatsoever.”

Renewed Hope Housing Advocates began in 1999 to promote the redevelopment policies for the Naval Air Station that would include housing for families priced out of the market.

A pdf of the file is available for download.
2009-09-23_RenewedHopeReport.pdf

Contacts:
Bill Smith/Renewed Hope (510) 522-0390
Eve Bach/Arc Ecology (510) 524-1800

-

Labels: ,

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Community Window July/Aug 09 Newsletter

Community Window on the Hunters Point Shipyard Cleanup releases the July/August 2009 newsletter.

http://www.arcecology.org/news/AUG09_ArcNews.pdf


Original Issue Date: AUG09, for July/August 2009.
Duration: 8 pagesAUG09_ArcNews.pdf
-AUG09_ArcNews.pdf

Labels: